How to use the Punter's Genie Form Analyis
Contents
Introduction to RaceScore and ConditionsScore
The Punter's Genie Form Analysis Tool is designed to show how the individual
form of the three major contributors to a runner stack up - namely the Horse, the
Jockey and the Trainer. It is well known that the past form of any of these items
is an indicator of how well they will do in the next race. However, there are two
major questions that need to be answered when considering form:
- How is the Horse/Jockey/Trainer going to fare considering the conditions of the
race for which they are entered
- How is the Horse/Jockey/Trainer going to fare considering not only the conditions
of the race but also their competition within that race.
To cover these two major areas of form study we have developed ConditionsScore
and RaceScore, two extremely powerful form analysis models.
ConditionsScore looks at the form of the Horse, Jockey and Trainer
with respect to the conditions of the current race (track, course shape, going,
tightness, etc)
RaceScore looks at the form for the Horse,
Jockey and Trainer for the current race and also takes into account the competition
in that race.
Where these two models differ from our usual Race Prediction models
is in their fundamental nature. The Race Prediction Models attempt to not only work
out which horse will win a race, but also work out which bets are best value and
the strength of each prediction. To achieve this we need to feed in the available
odds for each horse which is a step further than strict form analysis (as although
the available odds usually reflect the form initially, they can change for all sorts
of reasons, like inside knowledge, weight of money, the horse's general appearance
etc.).
The RaceScore and ConditionsScore models are fundamental
in nature because they are based purely
on the facts available regarding that Horse, Jockey or Trainer - the current odds
available for each horse are not fed into the models. This means that where our
predictions may be affected by an adverse amount of money going onto one particular
horse, our RaceScore and ConditionsScore form
figures are not affected. For this reason the form figures are equally valid from as soon
as they are posted right through the day.
The form score for each component of the runner (horse, jockey and trainer) is calculated
using only variables that are relevent to it. So to calculate the form score for
a horse, we only use variables that are relevent to the performance of the horse,
and not those dealing with the performance of the jockey or trainer. Of course,
This is still no simple task - each form score is calculated using thousands of
variables and combinations of variables. Our fourth form score - the Composite form
score - is derived using a combination of the horse's, jockey's and trainer's form
scores. Again, this is not a simple average - we have calculated the past form scores
for thousands of races and analysised them to find out what proportion of each component's
score actually contributes to the overall (or Composite) form figure for the runner.
Options available for the charts
The charts might look complicated at first, but we can assure you that they are
actually very straightforward. Each of the components of the runner (the Horse,
Jockey and Trainer) are given a score based complex analysis of their past form.
These form figures are then shown on the chart for each runner. You can select which
ones you wish to see at any time.
The fourth form score that can be shown on the chart is the RunnerComposite
form score. This is a combined score for all three components of the runner
- as we mentioned earlier, this is not just an average, but quite a complex combination
of all elements of the runner.
These are the options available for each chart:
Form Score Type
Here you have the option of choosing whether you wish to view the ConditionsScore
(Conditions Form Score) or RaceScore (Race Form Score).
Race
From this drop down menu you can choose which race you want to see the form figures
for. Initially we will be just dealing with Flat races, and the Jumps will be developed
later.
Include and Order
Here you can choose which form figure you wish to see on the chart and also how
the runners are ordered. You can choose any combination of Horse, Jockey,
Trainer and Composite. If you choose no items to show then the chart will just show
"No Data".
The Order By list only contains the form options you have
selected to view (Horse, Jockey, Trainer, Composite) plus one other, Horse Name,
allowing you to order the runners by the horse's name.
Form Scale
Sometimes it may be useful to view the form figures on a logarithmic
scale so we
have included that facility here.
How to read the charts
Here are a couple of sample charts to help explain what the various parts mean. We have chosen
an example with all four options ticked, ordered by "Composite" and have removed some sections to save space.
This chart is for 23rd April 2007 Pontefract 2.40pm with the ConditionsScore
form showing.
This chart is for the same race but showing the RaceScore figures:
The legend at the bottom of the chart shows you how the individual form scores are
coloured, but it will always be as follows:
Red: Horse Orange: Jockey
Green: Trainer Blue:
Composite
For each of your selected items (Horse, Jockey, Trainer and Composite) we will mark
the best one on the chart as shown in the examples.
As you can see from both of these charts Stringsofmyheart is well
fancied based on our analysis of the form. When looking at the conditions of the
race only (top chart), Stringsofmyheart was the best Horse, had the best Jockey
and also had the best composite. However, when we also consider the rest of the
competition in the race (bottom chart), Stringsofmyheart only has the best Trainer
and Composite form. Always Best is the best horse, and Force Group has the best
Jockey.
This tells us a few things, although a lot of this is open to interpretation. Lets
take the Jockey for example. When considering purely the conditions of the race
(ConditionsScore) D. Holland would be expected to win the race, all other things
being equal. However, when considering the rest of the competition in the race (RaceScore)
D. Hollands is no longer expected to win (again, all other things being equal).
This could mean that when each Jockey is considered individually D. Holland is the
best, but when D. Holland is racing against M. Hills (amongst the others) then M.
Hills would be expected to come out on top. If D. Holland and M. Hills have a history
of racing against each other then this could indicate that although M. Hills is
the lower ranked Jockey, he actually performs better when racing against D. Holland
- the reasons for this sort of anomaly probably being the cause of many heated discussions
in the pub between fans of the sport!
As we say, this is all open to plenty of interpretation, but this is the beauty
of these form figures. They are based purely on the facts of the race excluding
the available odds, so by looking at them and comparing them with the results of
the race we can make interesting and accurate interpretations of why things unfolded
as they did.
Oh - and the result of the race? Stringsofmyheart won (at 8/1) after a bit of a
battle with Force Group (7/1) towards the line.
Important information about the form scores
Unknown entities
If a horse, jockey or trainer is unknown (i.e. this is its first outing) then it
gets nominal score below the "OK" mark. This ensures a natural element of caution
in the unknowns.
Range of the Scores
Each element of the runner is scored from 0 to 1000. This is the theoretical range
for the element, but not all elements have ever reached their theoretical best.
We have measured the form of each horse, jockey and trainer over the last 10 years
and the following table shows the maximum score achieved by each for both ConditionsScores
and RaceScores.
|
Range of Form Scores for the past 10 years
|
|
Element
|
ConditionsScore
|
RaceScore
|
| Min |
Max |
Min |
Max |
|
Horse
|
0
|
993
|
0
|
585
|
|
Jockey |
63
|
999
|
30
|
250
|
|
Trainer
|
0
|
1000
|
31
|
210
|
As you can see, comparing the runner with the rest of the field brings down the
maximum Form Score they seem to be able to achieve.
The reason why we have left these scores as they are is that the "OK" score (i.e.
not poor and not good) for all elements is 100. Therefore, anything scoring over
100 is expected to perform well, while anything scoring under 100 is expected to
perform poorly.
Future Analysis
We will be using these form figures ourselves for various purposes. They will be
fed into the prediction models to improve them. We will also be analysing them over time and looking for an optimal betting
strategy that relies only on them. This might have advantages (possibly higher odds
winners) and disadvantages (more volatility) over our standard prediction models, but we are quite excited by some of the results
we are seeing so far!
Most importantly, as these form figures represent our purest analysis of the form
of Horses, Jockeys and Trainers yet they should become an invaluable tool for our
subscribers who prefer to do some of their own analysis before making their bets.